Beginner Time: 20 min Type: Code Application Focus: Panel Design / NEC Core
After this module: Understand where a branch circuit ends and a feeder begins, and why motor loads require the 125% conductor multiplier from Article 430.
Prerequisites: NEC Code Reading Fundamentals

Purpose

This module clarifies the boundary between branch circuits and feeders in motor-load systems, explains why motor conductors require the 125% multiplier, and shows how to apply the Article 430 feeder formula when multiple motors share a common feeder.


Branch circuit vs. feeder — the boundary

The NEC defines a branch circuit as the conductors between the final overcurrent protective device (OCPD) protecting the circuit and the outlet or load. A feeder is everything upstream of that final OCPD, from the service or source panel up to but not including the branch-circuit OCPD.

The dividing line is the final overcurrent protective device.

Segment From To NEC reference
Service conductors Utility connection Service OCPD Art 230
Feeder Service or source OCPD Branch-circuit OCPD Art 215
Branch circuit Branch-circuit OCPD Load (motor terminals) Art 210, Art 430

For motor circuits, the branch-circuit OCPD is typically the fuse or circuit breaker that is selected from Table 430.52, not necessarily the one that also provides overload protection.

flowchart LR
  SVC["Service / Source Panel"]
  FOCPD["Feeder OCPD\n(Art 215)"]
  BOCPD["Branch-Circuit OCPD\nTable 430.52"]
  DISC["Disconnect\n(Art 430.102)"]
  OLR["Overload Relay\nArt 430.32"]
  MTR["Motor"]

  SVC --> FOCPD
  FOCPD -->|"Feeder conductors\nArt 430.24"| BOCPD
  BOCPD -->|"Branch-circuit conductors\nArt 430.22 (125%)"| DISC
  DISC --> OLR
  OLR --> MTR

  style BOCPD fill:#f5f5dc,stroke:#999
  style FOCPD fill:#dce8f5,stroke:#999

Article 430.22 — Branch-circuit conductor sizing (125% rule)

For a single motor, Art 430.22(A) requires that branch-circuit conductors have an ampacity of not less than 125% of the motor full-load current (FLC) from the NEC tables (Table 430.248 for single-phase, Table 430.250 for three-phase).

Do not use the nameplate FLA. Use the NEC table FLC value. The nameplate full-load amperes (FLA) reflects the actual motor, which may run cooler or hotter than assumed. The table values ensure the conductor is not thermally stressed under normal operation.

Formula:

Minimum conductor ampacity = FLC (Table 430.250) × 1.25

Example — 10 HP, 460 V, 3-phase motor:


Article 430.24 — Feeder conductor sizing (multiple motors)

When a feeder supplies two or more motors, Art 430.24 sets the minimum feeder conductor ampacity as:

125% of the largest motor FLC + 100% of the FLC of all other motors

Formula:

Feeder ampacity = (FLC_largest × 1.25) + (FLC_motor2 + FLC_motor3 + ...)

Example — three motors on one feeder (460 V, 3-phase):

Motor HP Table FLC
Motor 1 (largest) 25 HP 34 A
Motor 2 10 HP 14 A
Motor 3 5 HP 7.6 A
Feeder ampacity = (34 × 1.25) + 14 + 7.6
               = 42.5 + 14 + 7.6
               = 64.1 A minimum

Select the next standard conductor size ≥ 64.1 A at 75 °C.


Key rules summary

Rule Article Requirement
Branch-circuit conductor ampacity 430.22(A) ≥ 125% of table FLC
Branch-circuit OCPD 430.52 + Table 430.52 Max % of FLC per device type
Feeder conductor ampacity 430.24 125% largest + 100% rest
Overload protection 430.32 Sized at 115–125% of FLA
Use NEC table FLC, not nameplate FLA 430.6(A) Table values govern sizing

Common mistake — nameplate FLA vs. table FLC

A frequent field error is pulling the amperage value from the motor nameplate instead of the applicable NEC table.

Source Value (10 HP, 460 V, 3Ø) Status
Motor nameplate FLA 12.8 A (example) Do not use for conductor sizing
Table 430.250 FLC 14 A Use this for Art 430.22 and 430.24

The table value is almost always higher, providing a code-compliant thermal margin. The nameplate FLA may be used for overload relay setting (Art 430.32), but not for conductor ampacity calculation.


Practical takeaway


← Motor and Panel Code Application ↑ NEC for Machines and Panels Disconnecting Means for Machinery →
Trust Boundary — Engineering Judgment Required

This site is a personal-use paraphrase and navigation reference for industrial automation standards. It is not a substitute for authoritative standards documents, professional engineering judgment, or legal review. All content is sourced from a local RAG corpus and has not been independently verified against current published editions.

Items marked TO VERIFY have limited or unconfirmed local coverage. Items marked NOT IN CORPUS are not covered in the local repository. Do not rely on this site for compliance determinations, safety-critical design decisions, or legal interpretation.